tennis365.net テニス365ブログ 新着記事を読む ]    [ テニス365 ホームショッピングニュースログイン ]

ekbr76mcdm

<<  2012年 12月
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          
カテゴリ別アーカイブ
最近のコメント
I like wat…
Brayden 10/29 20:32
Three year…
Chase 10/28 18:36
I came her…
Steven 10/25 11:26
I'm not in…
Destiny 10/25 11:25
Can you pu…
Peyton 10/21 18:42
最近の記事
up from 17…
12/24 23:16
up from 17…
12/24 23:07
In a state…
12/24 23:05
Robert Pur…
12/23 16:19
North Star
12/23 16:18
このブログサービスは「テニス365 テニスブログ」で運営しています。テニス365会員なら無料でご利用・作成いただけます。






there are downsides. For example

But guarantee issue laws for health insurance companies are fundamentally unfair. They punish those who are willing to pay for insurance by saddling them with costs far beyond what they should owe statistically, or what they should owe in a nationalized system,Cheap samsung LED TV. Health insurance rates in guarantee issue states like New York and New Jersey are around 3 to 4 times what they are in other states. Is it fair for a consumer in New Jersey to pay three times as much for the same health insurance as they would in another state? Of course it isn't. These consumers have been unfairly placed into a statistical pool that isn't representative of their health care needs, and forced to pay far more for health insurance than their situation dictates. And they are forced into this situation precisely because lawmakers have chosen a terrible hybrid model that removes any pretense of fairness in pricing that exist in the more natural nationalized and privatized models.







Similarly, a privatized health insurance system like that in place in the United States makes sense from an ethical standpoint. While it can lead to tragedies where uninsured people contract illnesses and cannot pay for medical treatment, it treats people in a fundamentally fair manner. Everyone is free to make their own decisions, and pay or suffer the potential consequences,cheap iphone 5. Those who wish to spend money to guarantee funds are available in case of medical emergencies are free to do so, and at a price that falls within their statistical risks.



As more and more people in the guarantee issue states become unable to afford health insurance, those states will be forced to answer for the fact that their policies have made them leaders in the numbers of uninsured. A new law called the Health Care Choice Act is being proposed to allow residents of one state to purchase health insurance from another. While legislators in guarantee issue states will oppose such laws, they'll have a hard time pretending they're doing so on behalf of their constituents who are actually paying for health insurance.






Canada has a nationalized health care policy that many in the U.S. wish to emulate. While the idea of promising health care benefits to all citizens is appealing, there are downsides. For example, many in Canada are forced into long waiting lines to receive health care treatment. In fact, the Canadian courts just ruled that many laws which barred citizens from seeking alternative health insurance options were unconstitutional. If the health care system in Canada were capable of serving all citizens in a timely manner, there would be no need to seek alternate routes. The Canadian courts were correct to view laws limiting how people can spend their own money for their own health benefits as inconsistent with their fundamental freedoms. But barring those attempts by legislators to enforce a monopoly on nationalized health insurance, the premise of taxpayers supporting a nationalized health care system makes sense from an ethical point of view. In such a system all taxpayers are subject to the same benefits and burdens with respect to their existing tax structures.



In a statement, the exclusive department store chain said that "Sales trends have been soft for the first two weeks of November in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy,buy apple imac. Many of our stores, representing about 40 percent of our total company revenues,Cheap apple imac, were directly impacted by the storm, and we have experienced a decline in saks.com sales generated from our customers in the Northeast." It expects flat same-stores sales during the quarter due to the storm.






As the overall macroeconomic environment remains very uncertain, we continue to approach the future cautiously," said Saks’CEO Stephen Sadove on Tuesday. Company’s third quarter’s sales climbed 3 percent to 713 million dollars, above the expected 692 million. The company said third-quarter earnings per share (EPS) rose 9 percent to 12 cents, in line with estimates. Sales climbed 3 percent to 713 million dollars, under expectations of 692 million dollars, reported Reuters.



During the third quarter, Saks sales and profits were hurt by what it called a "modest" spike in promotions, which lowered its gross profit margin by 0.3 point to 43.9 percent of sales. Nevertheless,Cheap apple macbook, the retailer reported net income of 22.6 million dollars, or 14 cents per share,Buy samsung LED TV, up from 17.8 million dollars, or 11 cents per share, a year earlier.



While there are genuine debates about whether privatized health insurance or nationalized health insurance policies make more sense, there can be little doubt that guarantee issue policies represent the most immoral type of hybrid between the two. The argument that everyone should be covered by health insurance is an argument for a nationalized health care policy. By contrast, believers in privatized health insurance argue that a private system yields more efficient pricing and cost controls in the health care field. But with guarantee issue health insurance policies, an immoral situation is created that undermines the benefits of a privatized system by poorly and immorally implementing some of the edicts of a nationalized system.


相的主文章:
日記 | 投稿者 ekbr76mcdm 07:50 | コメント(0)| トラックバック(0)
トラックバック
こちらの記事へのトラックバックは下のURLをコピーして行ってください。
コメント
この記事へのコメントはありません。
画像
画像の数字:
名前:
メールアドレス:
URL:
コメント: